• Investment
  • Insurance
  • Finance
  • Internet
  • Technology
  • 200Mbps
Trending
  • Caveat Emptor: Let the Buyer Beware!
  • Linux Hands On: Installation and the Basics
  • Muñiz Named GC&C’s Head of Construction & Green Energy; Gallagher Re Hires Hiscox’s Kim for Cyber; Chubb Promotes Kropp to Global Head of Operations and Technology
  • New Lines Drawn on the Battlefield as the Streaming Wars Heat Up
  • Data of 515,000 People at Risk After ‘Sophisticated’ Hack of Red Cross
  • Shell Appeals $2 Billion Court Judgment in Nigerian Oil-Spill Case
  • Russian-Backed Actors Targeting Canada’s Infrastructure, Intelligence Agency Warns
  • Can the growth in China’s electric vehicle sales drive automotive share prices?
MERDEKA MERDEKA
  • Investment
  • Insurance
  • Finance
  • Internet
  • Technology
  • 200Mbps
MERDEKA MERDEKA
You are at:Home » California City Pushing Back on $85M Award in Restraint Case
California City Pushing Back on $85M Award in Restraint Case

California City Pushing Back on $85M Award in Restraint Case

0
By admin on May 3, 2022 Insurance

San Diego County attorneys are searching for to wipe out an $85 million jury award to the household of man who died after being restrained by sheriff’s deputies in 2015, or get a brand new trial within the lawsuit that generated the case.

County attorneys contend the decision stemming from the negligence and wrongful dying lawsuit was “incurably contaminated with error” and that the trial was riddled with rulings that damage the county’s case.

The request is detailed in motions filed in U.S. District Court docket in San Diego earlier this month by county attorneys. They’re the primary strikes in what’s going to probably be a protracted struggle to cut back or utterly overturn the decision returned March 15 in favor of the household of Fortunate Phounsy.

One movement asks U.S. District Court docket Decide Marilyn Huff to put aside the decision, contending the proof was not adequate to assist the jury’s conclusion, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. A second seeks a brand new trial, or a discount within the award, arguing there have been a collection of trial errors and that the quantity awarded was extreme.

Phounsy, 32, died after being hogtied, shocked him with a stun gun and restrained by San Diego Sheriff’s Division deputies on the Santee residence of a relative on April 13, 2015. Phounsy’s coronary heart stopped on the best way to the hospital. He was resuscitated, however died a number of days later.

The county medical expert concluded his dying was unintentional and the results of the lengthy wrestle with deputies, mixed with the consequences of the drug ecstasy he had taken a number of days earlier than.

However attorneys for the household disputed that conclusion and argued that the conduct of the deputies brought on him to suffocate to dying.

They pointed to deputies binding Phounsy’s arms and ankles in restraints, failing to watch his very important indicators and persevering with to restrain him when one deputy forcibly held his head down whereas he was in an ambulance.

The case was tried twice in federal court docket. In September a jury deadlocked and couldn’t attain a verdict. At a second trial held in March, after solely a day of deliberation, the jury discovered the county liable and awarded Phounsy’s household $85 million.

Legal professionals for the household should nonetheless file their arguments opposing the county motions. In a press release, attorneys Mark Fleming and Timothy Scott stated the county remains to be evading accountability for Phounsy’s dying.

“The rehashed arguments raised by the County have already been rejected” by courts a number of occasions,” stated Scott. Fleming stated that the bid to chop the cash award disrespects “each the worth of Fortunate’s life and the enormity of his loss to his household, in addition to the arduous work and cautious consideration of the jury.”

Copyright 2022 Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Subjects
California

Crucial insurance coverage information,in your inbox each enterprise day.

Get the insurance coverage trade’s trusted publication

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleFAIR Plan Launches Higher Coverage Limits for Commercial, Business Properties
Next Article Hard Drives Stolen During Break-in at Washington Department of Labor Regional Office
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Russian-Backed Actors Targeting Canada’s Infrastructure, Intelligence Agency Warns

Shell Appeals $2 Billion Court Judgment in Nigerian Oil-Spill Case

Data of 515,000 People at Risk After ‘Sophisticated’ Hack of Red Cross

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

YOU MAY INTEREST
April 25, 2022

When is Tesla Going To Split Its Stock?

March 17, 2022

Minor Leaguers Work Year-Round, MLB Violated Wage Law

April 28, 2022

Compliance in Cannabis Can Be a Painstaking Task

March 23, 2022

Apple’s Latest Big Purchase is a British Fintech Firm

October 26, 2022

Is GameStop Stock a Good Buy For Investors In 2022?

Copyright © 2022 Merdeka
  • About
  • Contact
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Next Up
Hard Drives Stolen During Break-in at Washington Department of Labor Regional Office

Onerous drives, laptops, cellphones, workplace tools, door entry key playing cards, gasoline playing cards and different gadgets had been stolen…

Previous
FAIR Plan Launches Higher Coverage Limits for Commercial, Business Properties

The California FAIR Plan is now providing elevated protection limits for industrial and enterprise properties. The upper limits are being…

Random
The Ultimate Guide • Merdeka

Are you searching for methods to optimize your Fb Advertisements for actual property? In that case, you’re in luck! On…