Attorneys for the New York Giants and Jets groups have requested the courtroom to dismiss with prejudice the amended complaint from two fans upset that the franchises have New York of their identify however really play in MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.
The groups reject as implausible and unsupported the plaintiffs’ claims of false promoting and misleading practices for retaining New York names following their “well-publicized strikes” to New Jersey many years in the past.
The amended grievance “nonetheless fails to say believable claims and should be dismissed with prejudice,” in keeping with the groups’ attorneys.
The unique grievance by New Yorkers Abdiell Suero and Maggie Wilkins, filed in federal courtroom in Manhattan, had requested that the groups be required to maneuver their dwelling video games to New York and out of New Jersey.
Nonetheless, the plaintiffs later maintained that because the groups have refused to maneuver, they amended their grievance and now need the groups to take away New York from their names. The grievance alleges false promoting, misleading practices, fraudulent misrepresentation and negligence.
However the groups say the amended grievance is not any higher than the unique.
“The fraud declare merely recasts the allegations of the prior grievance’s ill-fated civil RICO declare. And the negligence declare is predicated on the alleged violation of a New Jersey statute from which defendants are expressly exempt,” the attorneys for the 2 NFL groups informed the courtroom.
Amended Class Action Wants NFL’s Giants, Jets to Drop ‘New York’ From Names
The groups argue that plaintiffs’ persevering with complaints relating to the Giants’ and Jets’ retention of their New York names following their relocations to New Jersey within the Seventies and ’80s nonetheless provide no foundation to assist claims for false promoting and misleading practices as a result of beneath New York regulation, these claims are held to requirements of “an affordable shopper performing fairly beneath the circumstances.”
“Since every membership started enjoying their dwelling video games simply seven miles west of midtown Manhattan many years in the past, they’ve overtly, constantly, and actually supplied first-class leisure for and squarely inside the New York metropolitan space. Defendants have by no means represented that the stadium is positioned anyplace aside from New Jersey. Neither is the New York element of the groups’ names understood to establish the situation of the groups’ stadium,” the groups stated.
The grievance seeks $2 billion in damages and a promise by the groups that they’ll cease publishing what Suero and Wilkins name the “Ten Lies” about their franchises, MetLife Stadium the place different groups play, and different choices. Additionally they need the courtroom to make MetLife Stadium discontinue its “cash-only” home windows at concessions which they are saying violates New Jersey regulation.
Picture: East Rutherford, NJ – Circa 2017: Metlife Stadium exterior day picture throughout parking zone tailgate earlier than New York Jets soccer sport sporting occasion
Desirous about Lawsuits?
Get computerized alerts for this subject.